A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out involving potential neighbours around the construction of a wall in a coastal web page within a north Dublin suburb, a scenario which includes attracted national awareness following an Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed family members property at Sutton Strand, where by allegations of organizing breaches, environmental worries, and extensive-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Times post about René Collier along with the Irish Situations short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has progressed right into a remarkably publicised lawful fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about development will work at the site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a corporation director respectively, request to make their spouse and children dwelling. The situation is becoming emblematic of wider disputes together Eire’s coastline, in which improvement pressures collide with environmental protections and also the sensitivities of established people. Based on the Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall being manufactured by their possible neighbours goes past the boundaries permitted underneath planning authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both of those inhabitants of Dublin Road, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their organizing authorization by building a wall further than the boundaries of their web site, resulting in an encroachment on a Exclusive Location of Conservation. The SAC designation is central into the dispute, as such spots are topic to demanding controls below European and Irish environmental legislation. In their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments could have lasting ecological outcomes, especially in the delicate coastal atmosphere for instance Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They're in breach of their arranging authorization, and say the wall, which is partially developed, is in the right posture. Their lawful team has characterised the action as an try to delay or frustrate a lawful development. The couple accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding so that you can preserve their see, an allegation that has been repeated in court docket and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal preparing disputes, in which views of the sea are each extremely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic efforts by the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, In keeping with sworn proof referenced while in the Irish Moments. In one account, Rene Collier waded via waist-significant drinking water for the duration of a storm to photograph the site Irish Moments, a picture which has since develop into emblematic in the depth with the dispute. These actions were not simply symbolic; they had been meant to Acquire visual evidence from the wall’s placement relative to tidal lines and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location within the sea Irish Instances reported, describing how the two men entered the water in the course of critical climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by way of storm drinking water to photograph the internet site grew to become one of the most putting descriptions to arise from courtroom reporting. The Irish Occasions report about accountant Paul Feely pointed out that these kinds of steps had been cited to display the plaintiffs’ belief which the wall prolonged into a region affected by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was remaining encroached on.
The occasions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been lined in detail with the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Occasions January 27 2026 became broadly searched phrases as viewers sought to be familiar with the background and implications of the case. On that day, the High Court read further submissions on regardless of whether interim orders really should be granted to halt development pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a essential second during the legal timeline.
Within the core of your dispute is really a disagreement around boundaries, arranging compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely keep which the wall, as produced, goes beyond what was approved and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, has long been referred to as meticulous in his examination of preparing files, maps, and situations attached into the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both of those pressured that their motion is determined by worry for environmental protection and adherence to arranging law. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving A personal check out, insisting as an alternative that it's about guaranteeing that advancement at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have described their long-standing relationship to the world and their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a pair basically seeking to produce a loved ones dwelling in accordance with the legislation. They deny the wall encroaches over a Unique Place of Conservation and say that all operates are actually carried out depending on Experienced advice and accepted options. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as getting into the sea for the duration of a storm, will not alter the fundamental info.
The situation has also elevated broader questions about how arranging disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute above building of wall at coastal web site is becoming a shorthand description for the predicament a large number of observers see as ever more prevalent. As sea stages rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation between non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming more contentious.
The Irish Situations short article about René Collier observed that the businessman experienced Earlier been associated with local advocacy on scheduling and environmental difficulties, however not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Periods report about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how folks from very unique Skilled backgrounds can discover on their own aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, are becoming synonymous Using the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website from the sea Irish Moments protection emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded through waistline-superior water through a storm to photograph the website Irish Periods and René Collier waded by means Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm water to photograph the site of midsection-high drinking water through a storm to photograph the website Irish Moments are phrases that appeared consistently in coverage, reflecting both equally the Actual physical reality from the coastline plus the symbolic mother nature of the act. For supporters in the plaintiffs, these actions shown determination; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an too much approach.
As being the High Court proceedings keep on, the end result stays uncertain. The courtroom have to establish if the wall as created complies with setting up authorization and no matter whether any encroachment right into a Special Location of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are complicated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal information, and preparing circumstances. Yet the human element continues to be central: neighbours who have to Dwell alongside one another very long after the legal expenditures are paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over design performs at the website on Dublin Highway, Sutton, even so the implications of the case prolong past that handle. For planners, developers, and people alike, the dispute serves being a reminder of the importance of clarity in scheduling permissions and sensitivity in coastal growth. Additionally, it underscores how immediately a local disagreement can escalate when elementary problems which include environmental safety and residence legal rights are perceived for being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains a spot of purely natural attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall within the centre from the dispute stands partly crafted, a physical manifestation of unresolved authorized thoughts. Regardless of whether it will eventually in the end be altered, taken off, or done as planned will rely on the courtroom’s conclusions. Right until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will probably keep on to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to One of the more intently viewed planning disputes in north Dublin in recent years.